9/11: A tale of how protocol was turned on its head. Crime scenes were destroyed. Eye-witness accounts & the outrageous money trail were completely ignored
AN HOUR AFTER 9/11, EVERY MAJOR NEWS CHANNEL HAD ZIONISTS PLOTTED UP, READY TO BE INTERVIEWED. IN THE US, JEROME HAUER, WILLIAM KRISTOL & PAUL BREMER. IN THE UK, FORMER ISRAELI PRIME-MINISTER, WAR CRIMINAL EHUD BARAK. WHAT MADE THIS SO EXTRAORDINARY WAS HOW THEY ALL SANG EXACTLY THE SAME TUNE –
– OSAMA BIN LADEN & MUSLIM TERRORISTS DID IT!
The key to understanding everything regarding 9/11 –
AN HOUR BEFORE 9/11, NO ONE SAID A DICKIE BIRD. AN HOUR AFTER, THOSE WHO CLAIMED THEY KNEW NOTHING –
– SUDDENLY KNEW EVERYTHING!
So I ask – how come the Zionist controlled media never once questioned these psychics as to how they knew who was responsible? You can say & think what you like but I’m afraid there’s simply no getting round this. It is incontrovertible – the very fact on the day these men were able to point the finger means they had to know something two hours earlier.
My Chronic Insomnia has all but driven me round the bend. I finally got an appointment into UK’s finest sleep clinic at Harefield Hospital. Overnight, you name it – I was strapped onto machines & electrodes. In the morning the doctor came in & said, “I don’t know how to say this but we can’t do anything for you!” YOU WHAT? I couldn’t believe it. I was devastated. Cut a long story short, the doctor said he’d never seen such a case. My condition was down to one thing – the GMM brain simply refuses to switch off. Hard as I try to empty my mind, I’m forever analysing & pondering even the most bizarre scenarios. So, it’s not a question of whether I jump to conclusions; I’m as close as damn-it the last person in the world who can!
So does that mean I yearn to work out everything? No. I just want to work out what I feel is important, what matters. what’s really going on & why we’re being lied to. I ask nothing. I don’t want anything! I just present my thoughts & suggest the best approach to tackle a particular dilemma. Anyone who wants to take me on is more than welcome. I say stick the detail. Sure it’s relevant but it’s hardly the be all & end all. Ascertaining the truth in terms of right & wrong; who’s innocent & who’s guilty; who’s leading us up the garden path & above all, adopting appropriate tactics so as to present a united front – this is what determines whether one possesses analytical prowess. It’s the whole package.
The detail is for those who specialise – lawyers, authors & historians. Our job is to get the perpetrators into the dock. Why waste precious time & energy squabbling over the finer points? With 9/11 especially, we have all the evidence we need, even proof yet we continue to play into the hands of the conspirators. Even if you believe Dr Judy Woods laser weapon theory or the ‘no planes hit the Towers’ scenario or that some Truthers are controlled shills – if you really do care about punishing those responsible, then you shouldn’t be pushing these ideas. Place them on the back-burner because if you don’t, whether you like it or not, your efforts will merely serve to divide the Truther movement. This is something we can ill-afford to do.
The moment the 2nd plane hit the South Tower I thought – WHAT! You’ve got to be kidding me. I was in my card club at the time & immediately cried out ‘why didn’t they shoot it down?’ The amazing thing is, though this question is entirely legitimate, over 14 years have passed & I’m still waiting for an explanation.
Part 1 – THE RIGHT TO QUESTION
Around 5 years ago I met a chief inspector of an anti-terrorist unit at a party. We started chatting & no surprise – he believed he was thwarting all sorts of terrorist attacks, fighting Muslim extremists, saving countless lives & so on. Even if this was so, what was painfully obvious from the word go, this anti-terrorist chief didn’t care a jot that the West’s foreign policies were largely responsible for creating the very terrorism, he was allegedly combating. So trying to explain to this guy the whole war on terror was entirely manufactured never entered my thought process. I knew this one was going to be a tough nut to crack.
So while he rambled on I thought ‘have I got a proper plum before me – fallen hook, line and sinker for everything the government & media have said!’ So, I simply said, ‘what I find so strange is why did they allow the 2nd plane to hit the Tower?’ He said, ‘allow?’ I said ‘well, didn’t it hit the building? ……… Silence. I said, ‘look. I’m not here to question you or your job but since you’re an expert on terrorism I thought you could perhaps enlighten me.’ He looked decidedly uncomfortable. So I said, ‘alright. Let’s say I agree with you on everything. Let’s say all we were told about 9/11 was accurate. I’m not contesting a thing! I JUST WANT TO KNOW WHY THEY ALLOWED THE 2nd PLANE TO HIT THE TOWER?’
Now, if we are being entirely reasonable here, this should be 3 match points for the GMM but does this chief inspector have an inkling something doesn’t add up here? Perhaps but for whatever banal reason, he wasn’t going to concede. For him the only thing that mattered was maintaining this ludicrous notion the official narrative was not just right but anyone questioning it could be a trouble-maker. Why do I say the latter? Because I trust my instincts & all of a sudden, I sensed bad vibes. Yet any investigation worth its salt would demand an answer to this question & many more. As much as those in power are loathed to do anything that may jeopardise their position, I struggle to come to terms with how a high-ranking police officer would deliberately dodge crucial issues in order to avoid the truth. To a large extent this conundrum was tackled by experts in Psychology on Richard Gage’s fine ‘Architects & Engineers: Experts for 9/11 truth.’ Yet though I believe & understand all that was said, I nevertheless find it hard to accept.
I calmly stated, ‘they knew flight 175 (the 2nd plane) had also been hijacked. This meant if the plane’s target was the South Tower (& let’s face it – you’d have to be daft not to think this was a distinct possibility), then many more innocent lives would be lost. Their duty was to save lives. Therefore, they had no option but to shoot the plane down.’ His reply beggared belief. ‘Do you know how hard it is to make a decision to kill all those people?’ Struggling to control myself I said, ‘WHAT? Haven’t you worked out that the passengers on flight 175 were fresh out of bargaining chips the moment flight 11 slammed into the North Tower? The passengers on flight 175 aren’t even in the equation. It’s about saving people in the South Tower. Do you think they should die too?’ Only for the blithering idiot to say, ‘you know, I can see where you’re coming from but I don’t know how you can be so heartless.’ I turned my back on him.
Questioning is everything. Questioning is learning. Questioning is a cornerstone of democracy. Questioning is essential. Questioning is a fundamental right. WHY DIDN’T THEY SHOOT DOWN THE 2nd PLANE? The moment this entered my thought process, it would remain there as if on auto-pilot. Imagine: 8.20 am – two planes reported hijacked. 26 minutes later Flight 11 slams into the North Tower. Okay. What’s the other plane doing? Only affected a 180 degree U-turn so as to be heading for downtown Manhattan. Okay. What’s in downtown Manhattan? Shit! The other Tower! 17 minutes later, 9.03 am, Flight 175 slams into the South Tower. Do you honestly believe such gross dereliction of duty is acceptable? Where on earth was America’s Civil Air Defense? Where the hell were the F16’s? And up to now, I’ve yet to perform a single feat. This is common knowledge.
If it was down to me, immediately I’d have had General Richard Myers arrested on a charge of Treason. Who’s this guy? Only the head of US civil air defense. What, was he on a tea-break or something? Myers criminal non-action meant several 100, maybe even 1000 of his fellow citizens lost their lives due to his negligence perhaps? No. How can it be? You see there’s a limit to how incompetent one can be! An integral reason questioning is essential is because it sets you on a process of elimination. Sherlock Holmes, the greatest sleuth of them all said, “once you eliminate all that’s impossible, whatever’s left, however improbable, therein lies the answer.” You eliminate what’s not possible & so at this early stage of the proceedings I can put my hand on my heart & say without fear of contradiction – the Bush Administration & the media had to be complicit because never once did they address this critical issue. Oh & by the way…… what do you think happened to Myers? HE WAS PROMOTED TO THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF!
What infuriates me so is many of my old friends think I’m crazy but only on this subject. You see if I challenged any of them to a pub quiz, there’d be no takers. However, what really does my head in is not one of them has ever bothered to ask patently obvious questions when it comes to 9/11. They simply accept what they’ve been told. Yet those who bury their heads in the sand have the gall to say I’m the crazy one? As far as I’m concerned, while they’ve a right to question what I say, they’ve no right to pass judgement. I’m the one asking questions. I’m the one trying to piece together a scenario that eventually can connect all the dots. What have they done? Unconditionally believe a cock & bull story while glaring discrepancies abound.
Off the top of my head I’m certain I can reel off 20 major anomalies regarding 9/11, anyone of which would be sufficient to cast very serious doubt on both the sequence of events that took place on the very day, as well as the official explanation. Better still, let’s apply some method. I’ll endeavor to concentrate my efforts on one crucial aspect of 9/11 – the investigation alone. Moreover, I’ll automatically eliminate everything that was included in the official explanation. How about that? Let’s just concentrate on what was totally ignored by the media & the 9/11 commission, breaking it down into three specific areas – Cui Bono. Who gained – the money trail: The Crime Scenes & Eye-witness testimonies.
Part 2 – FOLLOWING PROTOCOL
Unraveling a terrorist attack like 9/11 is the same as unraveling any crime. Motive & who gains simply has to form the foundations of any meaningful investigation but first there’s the sealing off of a crime scene in order for experts to meticulously collate all the data. How many times have we seen CSI Grissom do his nut simply because someone inadvertently stepped into his crime scene? 130 years ago, the great Sir Arthur Conan Doyle often had his remarkable Sherlock Holmes bemoaning ‘Watson. How the devil can one deduce anything when the Metropolitan Police have trampled over the crime scene?’ Now I’ll admit I have little or no knowledge of police procedure. Plain common sense tells me this –
1) Seal off the crime scene.
2) Touch nothing. Leave everything for the experts.
3) Evidence is logged, packaged & taken to their labs 4) Only they decide when they’re done.
Well, with 9/11, I think it’s safe to say Grissom would have blown a gasket! A heinous crime occurs. Politicians & media are up in arms, baying for blood. In the meantime what’s occurring at crime scenes defies logic. Forget about protocol being ignored like the plague. Even conceding to negligence & incompetence is totally inadequate. As I said earlier, there’s a limit to how daft one can be. What possible explanation is there for not one of the 4 procedures listed above to be followed? We’re talking about the fundamentals here. But before you even ponder over this – is it possible to imagine the worst is yet to come?
Incredibly the order was given to do effectively THE EXACT REVERSE! So what’s the antithesis of conducting an exhaustive examination of a crime scene? How about destroying & disposing all the evidence immediately? Leave no traces! In other words indulging in a course of action that would be ideal for the conspirators! And this is precisely what occurred! The fact everything was gathered, lumped together & shipped off to China for recycling is a detail that’s so astonishing one is well within their rights to effect a citizens arrest on the person or persons who gave this order. In an ideal world if Bush & Cheney were immediately arrested & water-boarded so as to discover why this was happening, I can guarantee you, in no time we’d all know who the real perpetrators behind 9/11 were. Therefore, without venturing any further we can safely draw these conclusions –
1) Terrorists would never even consider an operation like 9/11 because everyone knows within 5 minutes of hijacking planes, two F16’s would be either side each aircraft. The terrorist pilot would thus be faced with two options – land or be shot down. The Towers or any other building being a potential target doesn’t enter the equation. This is US civil air defense protocol ie what would happen each & every time a plane is hijacked.
2) The Bush administration at the very least, had to have allowed this attack to occur.
3) The perpetrators of 9/11 could only be those who possessed vast influence & power over US politicians & institutions, most notably the entire media apparatus. There can be no question – the only people who could have carried out 9/11 were those who the media would unconditionally lie for ie commit Treason.
Part 3 – CUI BONO. WHO GAINED – THE MONEY TRAIL
There is little doubt 9/11 was the mother of false flags. Yet this sordid episode in our history has proved to be unique in more ways than one. Inexplicable as it may seem, the media made nothing of the fact 9/11, (banking aside), was by far & away the greatest financial embezzlement in history. I’d be astonished if the Rothschild’s Napoleonic master stroke, which for almost 200 years reigned as numero uno mega fraud even gets close. Easy to say trillion but quite how one goes about gauging a trillion bucks so as to put this ungodly figure into some perspective, beats me. What I do know is 9/11 saw several $trillion exchange hands. The good news – those responsible, as well as those in the know, left a money trail wider than the Grand Canyon. The only trouble investigators would have had is knowing where to start! I say would have had as opposed to had because believe it or not, detectives never got out the traps. It’s debatable whether they even made it to the starting gate! So, no surprise – the bad news – the crooks still have the bread!
So, we have this nonsensical paradox – the greatest financial heist in history, with a money trail so vast detectives could be excused for thinking it must be Christmas …….Cui Bono, who gains, erupting from every orifice imaginable; motive, step No.1 for unraveling crime, sticking out like a sore thumb…….. & what happens?…….Zilch. Nada. Nothing! This alone should have alerted anyone with a functional brain. Our politicians & media were at the forefront telling us how terrible this attack was, yet lines of inquiry that would have been routine for a 14 year old were completely ignored. Why do I accuse the media so readily? Because they never once highlighted this glaring anomaly. This is as good as an admission of guilt.
Or the fact the media not once took Larry Silverstein to task. How could he side-step scrutiny? He bought the Towers for $15 million with the stipulation he had to replace no less than 400 tons of Asbestos, which initially was used as a fire-resistant material. The cost to replace the Asbestos would be approximately $1 billion. This was why he was sold the buildings at a knockdown price when almost 30 years earlier they cost around a billion to put up. So does Silverstein go looking for someone who’s figured out a way to neutralise Asbestos on the cheap? Hell no. Suddenly, all Larry’s interested in is building insurance, especially companies prepared to under-write rather unusual clauses. What am I talking about? Just this: Double indemnity. Silverstein insisted that should the Towers be destroyed in a terrorist act, he would be entitled to claim double the amount! To be perfectly honest, if you can’t smell a rat here, then you’ve got the brains of a rocking horse!
Silverstein’s role stinks from the get-go. What I can’t get over is the level of greed. He spends $15 million on two worthless buildings yet quite how he managed to acquire so much insurance cover is beyond me. I worked in the insurance business for over 3 years so I know the coup. Normally it’s impossible insuring anything for far more than it’s worth. Of course you can, but try claiming that amount. Buy a Ferrari for $50,000; insure it for a million but if the Ferrari suddenly goes AWOL, no insurance company is ever going to pay out a million. Be happy to get back what the car cost or more likely, what it’s worth. This is how the insurance business operates. Therefore, it’s safe to say, once again, with 9/11, even the insurance business tore up the rule book!
The only explanation that can connect all the dots is directors in all the companies underwriting these crazy policies had to be in on the coup. Knowing Silverstein would receive around $5 billion, inevitably lumpy backhanders would line their grubby mitts. There was plenty to go round. All the firms involved had to be complicit because not one director in any of these insurance companies raised a stink, double indemnity clause & all! No one demanded Silverstein sit a lie-detector test. What better way for the likes of Hank Greenberg to rip off his own company AIG to the tune of multi billions? And guess who was one of the directors of AIG? None other than the President’s brother JEB BUSH! Needless to say, the media never mentioned this. I guarantee one thing – if Silverstein & the directors of the insurance firms sat lie-detector tests, machine after machine would explode!
In any crime if its not a family affair, if you’re any sort of detective, all you have to do is follow the money. 3 days before 9/11 the Securities & Exchange Commission informed the authorities of highly irregular trading in a particular company. Not that this is anything special – what with insider trading, people will always try to make a fast buck. Still, legitimate investors have to have protection – the SEC is there to watch over potential skulduggery. A 3% move here, a 4% move there, a 5% swing in any share in one day would have trader’s tongue’s wagging. So I wonder what the authorities thought when the SEC informed them of a small matter of a 400% increase in trading in American Airlines? The next day the hemorrhaging continued with a 6 fold increase & on the 10th of September 2001 the SEC informed the authorities of an 11 fold increase in trading – all one-way – south!
Here’s where it gets interesting. I know enough about this because I also worked in the markets for 4 years in Geneva. I bought & sold shares & I can say categorically – its impossible to trade in shares, even a small investor, without names, addresses, bank accounts etc. IMPOSSIBLE! Get this into your head! Therefore, all those who traded in shares of American Airlines ARE ON RECORD! They’re there ….. yet the Bush administration & the 9/11 commission chose to ignore this – evidence that was clear-cut in identifying those who may have had prior knowledge to 9/11 & for 14 years nobody’s been able to explain this to me. The 9/11 commission wasn’t worth a bar of soap. The very least that should have happened is every last person that gained financially should have been forced to sit lie-detector tests & be made to answer one question – DID YOU HAVE PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF THE 9/11 ATTACK?
Could it be any more farcical? Well now we proceed from the sublime to the ridiculous! Imagine the plight of trading houses & all the layers who for the past 3 days had effectively guaranteed untold millions upon millions on put options on US Airlines. One morning they wake up & all of a sudden, aircraft are careering into buildings! They must have thought ‘what the hell’s going on here? My God! We’ve done our absolute brains!’ But no…….. It all went quiet! The phones went dead! Of course the last thing they were going to do was complain about it. I mean how can you fathom such a thing? No one was inquiring about their winnings! Imagine – its like winning the lottery, you’ve got the jackpot, you know it……. but for some reason you decide not to cash in the winning ticket!
Pure unadulterated greed! And greed of the worst kind because how many of these vermin actually thought about informing the police or the newspapers? And vermin they most certainly are because all those who sold Airline shares in the 3 days before 9/11 I grant you, enjoy a standard of living most of us only dream about. It takes hard cash to buy or sell shares. However, trading on ’futures’ ie ‘call & put’ options requires big money. At the time, these people were privy to information – information of a kind that was as unbelievable as it gets. But unbelievable as it was, they knew it was true – so typically, all they could think of was how to profit? Well, you can’t sell shares in the stability of skyscrapers & you can’t sell shares in the number of Americans that get massacred in one day but you can sell shares in US airlines.
The fact no share transaction can be performed anonymously; the fact the Bush administration & the 9/11 commission inexplicably failed to pursue a line of inquiry both with Silverstein & the Security & Exchange commission, means the official investigation, if you can even call it that, stopped short of asking the most transparently logical questions, which if answered, would almost certainly have provided genuine leads & answers as to who really was behind 9/11. Yet this was only the tip of the iceberg. What occurred at the Pentagon truly beggars belief.
Cast your mind back to Sept. 10th 2001, the day before 9/11, when it was deemed the ‘right’ time to tell Americans that $2.3 TRILLION of Pentagon money (US tax-payer money) had been misappropriated. Head of the Pentagon at the time was Rabbi Dov Zakheim, one of the chief architects of 9/11. Unbeknown to most Americans, 100+ Pentagon employees had been working in the Budget Analyst Office for quite some time for the specific purpose of locating the missing trillions. On the fateful day, even though everyone knew the Towers had been struck by two ‘highjacked’ planes; even though Dick Cheney had been informed another plane was heading for the Pentagon –
NOT ONLY DID THEY NEGLECT TO EVACUATE THE PENTAGON BUT A STAND DOWN ORDER WAS GIVEN SO THAT THE PENTAGON WAS ATTACKED!
Under oath to the 9/11 Commission, US transport Secretary Norman Mineta, actually confirmed that Dick Cheney issued an order to stand down. Now here, one cannot have a more clear-cut case of Treason yet the 9/11 Commission omitted Mineta’s damning testimony altogether! Once again, the entire mainstream media felt this was not relevant news. Yet…… I haven’t told you the most incredible aspect of this whole sordid affair. Bear in mind, in terms of square footage, the Pentagon is the largest building in the world! Now, take a wild guess –
WHERE DO YOU THINK THE PLANE/MISSILE HIT?
SLAP BANG INTO THE BUDGET ANALYST OFFICE, KILLING ALL THOSE TRYING TO LOCATE THE MISSING TRILLIONS, WHILE DESTROYING ALL THEIR DAMNING EVIDENCE. FORTUNATELY BACK UP FILES WERE STORED IN WTC 7, A 47 STOREY SKYSCRAPER ALSO OWNED BY LARRY SILVERSTEIN. SADLY, BEFORE ANYONE HAD A CHANCE TO GRAB THEM, AS IF BY MAGIC, THIS BUILDING ALSO COLLAPSED
ON ITS OWN ACCORD. NO PLANE HIT IT. THIS TIME, THE MEDIA DID MENTION IT, EXCEPT BOTH CNN & THE BBC REPORTED THE COLLAPSE OF WTC 7 –
22 MINUTES BEFORE IT DID COLLAPSE!
These chain of events don’t just provide damning evidence – all the proof one needs is here! To believe the official account of 9/11 when all I’ve just said can be verified with the minimum of fuss is simply too deplorable for words!
No mention was ever made in the 9/11 Commission how the Budget Analyst Office inexplicably was not evacuated or even that another building that day, WTC7, had collapsed. There’s good reason – it goes a long way to explaining who the real culprits of 9/11 were & how Israel ended up with the 3rd largest air-force in the world!
Incredibly, there’s more; plenty more. This video – 9/11 False Flag Conspiracy – Finally Solved (Names, Connections, Motives) – shows they squeezed every last bean they could. If ever there was a case of in for a penny, in for a pound, this was it. When I first watched this it blew me away.
Though we’ve seen it a million times on TV, we don’t think about these things when it really matters. Let’s say you’re the first to arrive on a crime scene. What do you do? It’s imperative to seal off the entire crime scene. Forget about TV – how many times have we actually seen the obligatory yellow tape/ribbon that’s used to cordon off a specific area? On the yellow band, in large black capitols it states words to the effect –
– if you’re a Tom, Dick or a Harry, then do not enter. THIS IS A CRIME SCENE!
So what’s the 2nd thing you’d do? Well, when Kojak got to a crime scene, Kroker or Saperstein would give him the lowdown. Then, you can be sure, the next thing Baldy would ask is ‘any eye-witnesses?’ It goes without saying – the Police are far more likely to apprehend & punish a criminal or solve a crime if they have eye-witness testimony, the more the merrier. Then, when you get back to the office, the first thing you ask is who gained? Who wanted this? Who did this help?
1) Seal off the Crime Scene
2) Take statements from all the eye-witnesses.
3) Follow the money trail.
Part 4 – EYE WITNESS ACCOUNTS
How ironic! Has any criminal act had more eye-witnesses? I’m not sure but I struggled to think of another event which beats 9/11 for the sheer number of first hand eye-witness accounts. This is the dream scenario for any detective. One eye-witness can make all the difference in a court of law & it works both ways – an independent eye-witness can be the only reason you remain free as a bird. The flip side to this coin though, more often than not, could have you munching on a diet of porridge come wallpaper paste for quite some time.
9/11 could not have taken place without the conspirators being sure they could rely on their Zionist pals in the media. However, on the day the vast majority of media personnel had no idea this was an inside job. So they went out as reporters do, attempting to piece together what exactly occurred. What better way to do this than seek out eye-witness accounts? The conspirators knew they had to suffer this for one cannot censor live TV on the day of a major disaster. The censorship would start in earnest the very next day. This is what they prepared for. Any eye-witness account or anything delving too near the truth would be ignored like the plague, never to be repeated on the airwaves again.
Make no mistake – mainstream media aired two versions of 9/11, both so far removed from each other you could be excused for thinking there were two separate catastrophes. There were the eye-witness accounts on the day & then there was the official narrative. The conspirators knew they only had to ride out the first day. Fortunately for them it was a day where everyone naturally was consumed with shock. Whatever eye-witnesses there were; whatever the Fireman, Police & Paramedics were saying, the media & significantly, those in the know behind the scenes would slowly but surely establish their version of events as if nothing untoward was occurring. Genuine eye-witness accounts would be limited strictly to the domain of the Internet.
So, imagine you’re one of the chief architects of 9/11. Is there anything you can do to counteract the barrage of truth from the countless eye-witnesses? In the 9/11 documentary ‘Loose Change’ Dylan Avery cottoned on to how some people could be seen chomping at the bit to be interviewed. When they got their chance it was like they were on a game show. You’d go from a person in a semi-state of shock to a guy that was an eager beaver, explaining to reporters how he ‘witnessed’ the two planes crashing into the Towers & how they collapsed due to the intense heat. Talk about a reporter’s dream – these guys were answering questions THAT WEREN’T EVEN ASKED!
I remember seeing an interview on the day – a guy who ‘knew’ way too much & gave an altogether different version to everyone else. Cool, calm & collected, he read his lines as if he’d learned them off by heart & he couldn’t wait to tell everyone. Of course, with all the False Flags we’ve had since 9/11, it’s become increasingly evident ‘crisis’ actors or those on the CIA payroll are used to help hoodwink the public. Now I can’t say I’ve proof but I’ll gladly bet my life this is the case because it’s perfectly reasonable to assume the conspirators knew this option was available to them. Not that I need any confirmation but there were two ginormous giveaways – the account given was total bullshit & it just so happened to be identical to the official view!
Cut a long story short, on the fateful day we had numerous testimonies from members of all the emergency services. They were adamant – bombs were going off all over the place in both Towers. Those who saw the 2nd plane career into the South Tower categorically stated it was a grey military plane. Some noticed there were no side windows. Very few people believed passenger planes were involved. Now these were first hand eye-witness accounts from people who had no reason to lie. The sad truth is, their testimonies alone would have blown the official account out the water. So……. the media never aired them again & the 9/11 Commission deemed the unthinkable – key eye-witness accounts were surplus to requirements.
Much the same occurred at the Pentagon. Employees stated there were two explosions while just about every bystander outside countered the notion a large passenger jet hit the building. Air-traffic controllers from the Washington DC sector said the incoming plane was a military jet. Radar data confirmed this. At Shanksville, even media reporters stuck their necks out to say there were absolutely no signs of any passenger plane having crashed there. Once again crucial eye-witness accounts were totally ignored & bear in mind, just one would have made all the difference in a court of law. If this is how we run our lives – small wonder we’re in the khazi!
Knowing the truth about 9/11 can at times be rather soul-destroying. How anyone can be fooled is a moot point? On September 11 2001, a crime of the century occurred & instead of protocol being meticulously adhered to CSI style, it was as if Chief Wigham of Simpsons fame coordinated the entire investigation. And the crazy thing is – I’M NOT JOKING ONE BIT! This analogy, daft as it sounds, is entirely accurate because what took place on the day of 9/11 was the exact opposite of what should have occurred.
Part 5 – How to convince people 9/11 was a Mossad/CIA job.
Over the last 14 years I’ve fine-tuned my 9/11 pitch so that now I’m confident I can convert those with brains as dense as a light-year of lead! Reeling off fact after fact is not the way. Not only does this give the impression you care too much, the last thing you want is to bore people with detail & most crucially, make them feel you know infinitely more than them. Simply try to plant a seed. Your job is to get them to think. Those who go on about laser weapons, holograms & this daft notion planes did not hit the Towers…….
EVEN IF THESE THEORIES ARE CORRECT, THEY WILL MERELY SERVE TO SPLIT THE TRUTHER MOVEMENT. THE MEDIA, AS A RESULT, WILL PROCEED TO PORTRAY TRUTHERS AS WEIRDO CONSPIRACY THEORISTS. IT IS IMPERATIVE WE PRESENT A UNITED FRONT. THE MORE WE ENTERTAIN RADICAL IDEAS, THE MORE WE AID THE TRUE CONSPIRATORS.
SO, FOR NOW KEEP IT SIMPLE. NEVER GET ANGRY. MAKE OUT IT’S NO BIG DEAL. WE’RE TALKING REVERSE PSYCHOLOGY HERE. REMEMBER THE PEOPLE YOU’RE TRYING TO CONVINCE MUST NEVER FEEL YOU KNOW MORE THAN THEM.
An integral reason I wrote this is because I wanted to emphasise that exhaustive research is not required. The truth is literally staring at us in the face. I said I’ll make my case merely by eliminating everything that was included in the official explanation. I’d simply concentrate on what the media & 9/11 commission ignored Since we have all the evidence we need, what earthly reason is there to squabble among ourselves over detail? All you have to say is –
‘Look. If you choose to label people conspiracy theorists, fine. That’s your call. All I’m saying is I’ve seen loads of controlled demolitions on TV & on 9/11, I FELT THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT I WAS WATCHING! If you honestly believe that warrants being branded a conspiracy theorist then I can only wonder what the hell your eyes saw!
Learning every last detail about 9/11 & trying to convince people 9/11 was an inside job are TWO ENTIRELY DIFFERENT THINGS! When it comes to utilising the best tactics, I’m sorry but most people leave much to be desired. I’m sure all of us try in good faith to spread the word but since I’m forever receiving the same messages from friends saying ‘hard as I try, I can’t get people to realise they’ve been duped. They don’t want to know’, perhaps this is a better avenue of attack. At least experiment. Try it.
My approach I grant you has a near 90% success rate. I’m emotional alright but getting hot under the collar over 9/11? No more. Do that & it’s game over! When that sunk in, I knew I had to modify my approach. 12 years ago I was lucky to convert 1 out of 5. So I thought about it & ended up making a video entitled –
– HOW TO CONVINCE PEOPLE 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB.
To say we need a drastic overhaul of the way we organise ourselves is a chronic understatement. If we ever get the chance to create a new system of government, it is imperative it’s one where money cannot talk & the law cannot be broken at will. Quite how these evil people killed their own people & then blamed those who had nothing to do with 9/11 & as a result millions of innocent folk have lost their lives; millions more rendered homeless – their lives all but destroyed, all on bare-faced lies. It’s positively gut-wrenching how some humans can be so evil. The only light I see is increasing numbers of people are waking up to the fact we’re ruled by gangsters. The question is whether we can do something about it.
I thought I’d add Dr Kevin Barrett’s: 9/11 Probe Closing in on Israel –
– and this excellent video: Trump, Israel & 9/11 which features Dr Alan Sabrosky –
WRITER BIO: Michael Aydinian is a political analyst, a freelance writer and a severe critic of corporate media. He is currently living in the UK.
Follow me on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/
Check out Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/
Permission is hereby granted to re-publish in part or whole any of my articles with proper citation and link back to the original article.