Governments Have No Right to Introduce, Let Alone Fast-Track any Legislation, without Initially Informing the Public of Their Intention, Prior to an Election
Category: SpecialsPublished on Friday, 24 April 2015 11:19Hits: 3902 , Author: Michael Aydinian
Governments Have No Right to Introduce, Let Alone Fast-Track any Legislation, without Initially Informing the Public of Their Intention, Prior to an Election
Whatsupic — Every so often Zionist Corporate media conjures up a phrase which sounds so tame and unassuming, ie perfect for their cause, it’s used incessantly and as a result, folk subconsciously accept it as a reasonable, legitimate term. Example: “Quantitative easing.” Google it and you’ll come across a plethora of long-winded explanations that invariably leaves you just as far from the true meaning as you were before. Yet am I not within my rights to say this phrase, in most people’s minds, helps to legitimize a working process which has done nothing less than allow multi-billionaire Banksters to rape treasuries? So let’s now explain this in layman’s terms.
Quantitative Easing
In the old days bank robbers could only snatch a certain amount of cash. In no time PC Plod would be on their case like a rash. Once nabbed Mr. High Court Judge would dish out 20 year jail terms as if they were going out of fashion. Woe betide if you kept the loot. Now banksters are in a different league altogether. For starters, they decide how much to steal! So, naturally…….. the cupboard’s going be left bare. Why take a few million when everyone can fill their boots with a few billion? And that’s exactly what they did – 100’s of billions went walkies! Wait. Here’s the good news – unlike bank robbers they can live it up all they like because for them, there’s absolutely no come-back! But here’s the real kick in the ging-gang goolies – what they’ve stolen, is now our debt!
How do they get away with such blatant daylight robbery? Well first of all, no one in the media will ever explain it like this ie in simple plain English! Also if they wanted ordinary folk to get the raving hump with these mega thieves, they’d keep reminding us of how they ripped us off. But we know only too well, or at least by now, we should know, that along with our politicians, they own the entire mass-media. Therefore the last thing the press will tell us is what these crooks are really up to and since there’s no audit of the Federal Reserve or the Bank of England, they don’t even have to explain where all the money’s gone! It’s simply unbelievable – bad enough pulling off a Trillion dollar fraud but to do it without anyone ever tapping you on the shoulder?
Quantitative easing
So where does quantitative easing come into it? Having our piggy-bank well and truly pillaged, even though we continue to pay taxes to the government, there’s nowhere near enough money in the tank to cover costs. Worse still, we actually have to pay these blood-suckers interest on this debt that they saddled us with! So to make up the shortfall, our only option is to print money. The thing is, though some have no idea why this is bad practice, everyone understands the phrase ‘print more money.’ This is too near the truth. Puppet politicians and media can do without having to explain why they need to print more money or why it’s bad news if they do. Thus the creation of an imaginary buffer – call it quantitative easing instead. There. It’s almost soothing. We are being eased; they’re making things easier for us.
Just to put the record straight, naturally there’s a price to pay for over-printing money. The more one prints, the more one lowers the value of their currency. Of course if one continues to do this, it inevitably leads to hyper-inflation and a worthless currency. As a result, the people of that country struggle to import anything of worth. All of a sudden – hello banana republic! This is why currency markets fluctuate. To give you some idea of how the UK currency has plummeted in value – in 1968 one pound Sterling got you 10 Swiss Francs. Today that pound will get you less than 1.5 Swiss Francs – an astonishing 700% decline in value. Gives you some idea of the level of mis-management or in this case, downright fraud! Quantitative easing
And so this brings me to the most recent entry into the ‘Zionist Almanac of phrases and words to hoodwink the public.’ This one is beginning to drive me round the bend – Fast-track (legislation). I can understand the word being utilised in a myriad of ways but since when was legislation fast-tracked? On the surface, this may not seem so conniving but I feel there’s plenty more to this than meets the eye. I believe this is part and parcel of the process where people are being taken for an almighty ride.
In the past, if a certain piece of legislation required the hurry-up treatment, more often than not there existed a logical reason for doing so. From what I see today, not only this is occurring way too frequently, what I find so disturbing, virtually all the legislation being fast-tracked was never so much as a manifesto pledge. Now, do you hear this? I can’t begin to emphasize because the ramifications are enormous. I reiterate – legislation that we’re told nothing of is being rushed through the corridors of power on the quiet, no debate, no nothing…… and suddenly we have to abide by these new laws. This in itself sounds criminal to me. We’re going back to days of the Magna Carta!
How can this be? Politicians have no right to usher in laws without telling us. We have to be able to draw this line otherwise we’re basically saying ‘you can simply do as you please!’ If Cameron has it in his heart to criminalize criticism of Israel or to outlaw any questioning of the cock and bull official account of 9/11, then surely we all have a right to know this is his intention long before voting for the sniveling little rat? It stands to reason, prior to any act being brought before parliament, let alone ratified, the public has to know well in advance that this may be part of the itinery. How else can we debate and mull over particular issues? This is the very essence of democracy.
Now, here’s the really bad news: We’re not simply talking about legislation and new laws being thrust upon us on the sly. Oh no. Crucially, all the legislation being fast-tracked, undoubtedly are bonafide vote losers, each and every one. We’re talking about suppressing freedom of speech, outlawing demonstrations, continuing our evil, disastrous foreign policy, criminilizing criticism of Israel, making an enemy out of Russia, giving the Police even more power, all this spying, ushering in the dreaded TPP – I can go on and on listing policies Cameron’s either implemented or has in the pipeline, where had he informed the public, many who voted for him, would not have done so.
There are two main reasons why they’re going about their business in such an underhand way – Cameron knows the vast majority of the public want nothing to do with laws that deprive us of our most fundamental rights. Also they know they can. Most people are incapable of seeing the wood from the trees. The media do their bit by saying nothing when they should be screaming blue murder. Merely saying the government is fast-tracking the TPP is not worth a bar of soap. Far as I’m concerned the definition of fast-tracking is – rapidly, royally screwing us and in the process ensuring we know as little about it as possible.
This ultimately is what it’s all about – create an imaginary fear of terrorism in order to pursue a hidden agenda. Thank you very much Mr. Cameron but I’ll take my chances with terrorists. Why should I or any of us have to pay for the mistakes and skulduggery of incompetent, criminal politicians like you? This so-called war on terror has been going on for 13 years. I only wish more people could see that this war on terror is, in actual fact, a declaration OF war by Israel, the US, UK and Saudi Arabia. What irony – the greatest terrorists on the planet by a proverbial mile are those who have the gall to moan about it all the time!——————————————————————-The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of, and should not be attributed to, the Whatsupic.