When it comes to hoodwinking the public there’s a lot more than meets the eye. Over 100 years of experience has gone into perfecting this art.
Back in April I wrote a piece regarding how certain phrases are conjured up out of thin air by the Zionist propaganda machine, more commonly known as the BBC, CNN, FOX & all the rest of the garbage, seemingly tame & unassuming, while providing an opportunity for those who wish to appear a touch more intelligent than they are simply by repeating them. Across the media spectrum each & every news channel nonchalantly treat us to a new phrase that no one’s ever heard. Nobody stops to think – how news channels dreamed up this new phrase all at the same time? Cor, that was lucky! As a result, folk subconsciously accept them as reasonable, legitimate terms. A few days after I wrote the piece I cursed myself because I realised I’d omitted the most glaring example
Firstly, this is what I wrote in April in the piece – Governments Have No Right to Introduce, Let Alone Fast-Track any Legislation, without Initially Informing the Public of Their Intention, Prior to an Election – Example: “Quantitative easing.” Google it and you’ll come across a plethora of long-winded explanations that invariably leaves you just as far from the true meaning as you were before. Yet am I not within my rights to say this phrase, in most people’s minds, helps to legitimize a working process which has done nothing less than allow multi-billionaire Banksters to rape treasuries? So let’s now explain this in layman’s terms.
In the old days bank robbers could only snatch a certain amount of cash. In no time PC Plod would be on their case like a rash. Woe betide if you kept the loot. Once nabbed Mr. High Court Judge would dish out 20 year jail terms as if they were going out of fashion. Now…… banksters are in a different league altogether. For starters, they decide how much to steal. So, naturally…….. the cupboard’s going be left bare. Why take a few million when everyone can fill their boots with a few billion? And that’s exactly what they did – 100’s of billions went walkies! Wait. Here’s the good news – unlike bank robbers, they can enjoy the high life all they like because for them, there’s absolutely no come-back! But here’s the real kick in the ging-gang goolies – what they’ve stolen, is a debt the public has to pay back! Think about Cameron’s austerity measures now!
How do they get away with such blatant daylight robbery? Well first of all, no one in the media will ever explain it like this ie in simple plain English! Also if they wanted ordinary folk to get the raving hump with these mega fraudsters, they’d keep reminding us in the papers & the rags how these greedy scumbags ripped us off. These vermin were already multi-millionaires! But we know only too well, or at least by now, we should know, that along with our politicians, the Bankers themselves own the entire mass-media. Therefore the last thing the press will tell us is what these crooks are really up to and since there’s no audit of the Federal Reserve or the Bank of England, they don’t even have to explain where all the money’s gone! It’s simply unbelievable – bad enough pulling off a trillion dollar fraud but to do it without anyone ever tapping you on the shoulder?
So where does quantitative easing come into it? Having our piggy-bank well and truly pillaged, even though we continue to pay taxes to the government, there’s nowhere near enough money in the tank to cover costs. Worse still, we actually have to pay these blood-suckers interest on this debt that they saddled us with! So to make up the shortfall, our only option is to print money. The thing is, though some have no idea why this is bad practice, everyone understands the phrase ‘print more money.’ This is too near the truth. Puppet politicians and media can do without having to explain why they need to print more money or why it’s bad news if they do. Thus the creation of an imaginary buffer – call it quantitative easing instead. There. It’s almost soothing. We are being eased; they’re making things easier for us. How nice.
Bringing me to the most recent entry into the ‘Zionist Almanac of phrases and words to hoodwink the public.’ This one is beginning to drive me round the bend – ‘Fast-track’ (legislation). I can understand the word being utilised in a myriad of ways but since when was legislation fast-tracked? On the surface, this may not seem so conniving but I feel this is part and parcel of the process where people are being taken for an almighty ride. In the past, if a certain piece of legislation required the hurry-up treatment, more often than not there existed a logical reason for doing so. From what I see today, not only this is occurring way too frequently, what I find so disturbing, virtually all the legislation being fast-tracked was never so much as a manifesto pledge. Now, do you hear this? I can’t begin to emphasize because the ramifications are enormous. I reiterate – legislation that we’re told nothing of, is being rushed through the corridors of power on the quiet, no debate, no nothing…… and suddenly we have to abide by these new laws. This is how they intend to usher in the TPP & news criminal laws regarding the Internet. We’re going back to days of the Magna Carta!
Now for the one I missed – Note how the contemptible Benjamin Netanyahu & his media cohorts utilise the phrase ‘two-state’ (solution). What do you make of this? I wonder how many people actually realise right here is one of their clever little strokes, just one among a whole array of con tricks deliberately conjured up to keep the public as far away from the truth as possible. This term two state actually sounds weird, almost as if it’s an alien concept that no one would want to adopt. When you think of a country you don’t think of a two-state solution! As I said – THEY USE EVERY TRICK IN THE BOOK! You see what this phrase really means is ‘the Palestinians cannot have bugger all. Zilch. They’re not entitled to any rights! Get that straight you suckers!’ That’s what it means. No difference, except Netanyahu can’t say that……. but he can say ‘a two-state solution is non negotiable’ and few folk think anything of it. Catch my drift……..